I found this interesting resource today (here is the .pdf version). It’s a comparison of the wording of the 1689 London Baptist Confession with the Westminster Confession of Faith. Here is a link to James Anderson’s website where this stuff is housed. Since I’m plugging his comparison chart, I wanted to give him proper recognition.
While I haven’t had the chance to read through the document and compare it at particular points, I’ve been looking for such a parallel table for a while now. If anyone knows of any historical-theological work that’s been done comparing the two confessions, I’d be grateful for some bibliography. Go ahead and leave them as comments.
Happy comparing!
___________
Andrew
The Reformed Reader Blog 
Samuel Waldron wrote an exposition of the 1689 confession. When the wording of the LBC differs from Westminster, he explains why.
http://www.amazon.com/Baptist-Confession-Faith-Samuel-Waldron/dp/085234340X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1234462320&sr=8-3
You may also be interested in this:
True Confessions which contains LBC 1644, LBC 1677, Savoy, WCF, and others side by side for comparison
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let me guess…the differences in wording are paedo-baptism versus believer’s baptism.
LikeLike