Pietism and Subjectivism: Undoing Biblical Worship

  The Pietist movement and subjectivism are two things – among others – that have corroded, watered down, and weakened Christian worship in the United States.  When all the emphasis is on the self, feelings, experiences, and emotions, you know you’re in the realm of pietism and subjectivism (that or an Oprah show).  We’ve all heard these types of phrases: “what will my heart feel” to “I could sing of your love forever,” to “I feel your presence” to “let it burn in me.”  The objective truths of Scripture – sin and salvation - are only alluded to (if at all) and the enraptured feelings of the inner self are front and center.  Rather than asking what God wants us to do in worship, many simply do what makes them feel a religious “high.”  Unfortunately this is even prevalent in many Reformed and Presbyterian churches which historically have placed the objective truths front and center. I like what Scott Clark has to say about this topic.

“Perhaps the most outstanding example…of the subjective turn in Reformed piety is in public worship.  It would not be hard to find a Reformed congregation today in which the Sunday (or Saturday night) liturgy begins with twenty-five minutes of Scripture songs sung consecutively, each song blending into the next, perhaps augmented by a Power Point or video presentation.  In this increasingly popular liturgy, the singing is followed by a dramatic presentation which, in turn, is followed by congregational announcements, most of which focus on the various cell-group programs.  Increasingly, the sermon is a brief, colorfully illustrated, emotionally touching collection of anecdotes, in which the hearer is not so much directed to the law and the gospel, but, in one way or another, to one’s self.”

“Anxious to intensify the religious experience of parishioners or to make the church accessible to the nonchurched, many Reformed congregations have turned to new measures, to drama, dance lessons, and even a service arranged thematically by the name of the local professional sports franchise.  Such practices are rather more indebted to eighteenth- and nineteenth-century revival practices than they are to Geneva, Heidelberg, or Westminster Abbey.  Such practices are also symptoms of the synthesis of Reformed worship with the emerging modern culture in which, as Philip Rieff noted, hospital and theater replace the church” (p. 73).

 R. Scott Clark, Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R, 2008).

shane lems

Hyper-Calvinism

I’ve bumped up against hyper-calvinism on and off for the past 15 years or so.  For a time I checked it out, dabbled with it, and thought about it.  Thankfully a wise pastor steered me away from its dangers.  What is hyper-calvinism?  I think of it as Calvinism on the steroids of rationalism; I also think of it as a belief system which limits the free grace of God.  J. G. Machen’s quote here is one that has really helped me understand God’s grace in a way that makes me thankful I’m not a hyper-calvinist.

 ”Salvation is as free for us as the air we breathe; God’s the dreadful cost, ours the gain.”

Bavinck is also helpful.

“Christ did not die for a few but for many, for a large multitude.  He gives his life as a ransom for many; he sheds his blood for many; he will make many righteous.  It is not a handful but many who by one man’s obedience will be made righteous [Rom. 5:19].  Scripture is not afraid that too many people will be saved.  Therefore based on that same consideration, it says that God has no pleasure in the death of the wicked and that he wants all humans to repent and be saved, that Christ is the expiation of and has given his life for the world, and that the gospel must be preached to all creatures” (Reformed Dogmatics III.465).

One more – John Murray on page 109 of Redemption Accomplished and Applied.

“The overtures of grace in the gospel addressed to all men without distinction [the universal call] are very real and we must maintain that doctrine with all its implications for God’s grace, on the one hand, and for man’s responsibility and privilege, on the other.”

Machen’s quote above is certainly worth memorizing and the others are worth pondering.  If you’re interested in this topic, I suggest getting The Pattern of Sound Doctrine and reading R. S. Clark’s chapter in it, which covers this very topic in an excellent way.

By the way, Machen’s line above was from chapter 6 of Christianity and Liberalism

shane lems

sunnyside wa

Christ and Culture Conference: Friday/Saturday (WSC)

 

You’re not going to want to miss this: Westminster Seminary (California) is hosting a conference entitled ”Christ, Kingdom, and Culture” – discussing these things from a confessional Reformed perspective.  Date: Friday/Saturday - Jan 15/16 at the WSC campus in Escondido, CA.  Go here for more info.  Speakers include Michael Horton, Dennis Johnson, Robert Godfrey, David VanDrunen, and Steve Baugh.

NOTE: For those of you who can’t make it, they are making the conference accessible via live webcast feed.  Tune in (click here) for free – @ 7PM Pacific Standard Time on January 15 (this Friday).  Also note that the Mp3s, CDs, and (possibly) DVDs will be available for a good price after the conference.  Finally, check out this book (by D. VanDrunen) on the same topic (mine is in the mail…stay tuned).

Enjoy!

shane (and andrew)

sunnyside wa